Ocary Braithwaite v. George Hinkle


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00879-TSE-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998531153] [10-7390]

Download PDF
Ocary Braithwaite v. George Hinkle Doc. 0 Case: 10-7390 Document: 12 Date Filed: 02/24/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7390 OCARY BRAITHWAITE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden (GRCC); THOMPSON, Dr., Medical Physician; D. SPEARS, Nurse; BENJAMIN ELLIS, Medical Physician; MR. GERARD F. BOYLE, CEO, Prison Health Srv., Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00879-TSE-JFA) Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: February 24, 2011 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ocary Braithwaite, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant George M. Hinkle. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-7390 Document: 12 Date Filed: 02/24/2011 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Ocary Braithwaite appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to George Hinkle and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's Accordingly, we affirm Braithwaite v. opinion and find no reversible error. for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinkle, No. 1:09-cv-00879-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 20, 2010 & entered Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?