Benoit Tshiwala v. Gregg Hershberger
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-02232-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998756664].. [10-7455]
Appeal: 10-7455
Document: 27
Date Filed: 01/04/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7455
BENOIT TSHIWALA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
GREGG HERSHBERGER, Warden; DOUGLAS
General of the State of Maryland,
F.
GANSLER,
Attorney
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv-02232-AW)
Submitted:
December 20, 2011
Decided:
January 4, 2012
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Eugene Bair, BENNETT & BAIR, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellant.
Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 10-7455
Document: 27
Date Filed: 01/04/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Benoit
Tshiwala
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying relief on the Fourth Amendment claims he raised in his
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. ∗
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Tshiwala v. Hershberger,
No. 8:09-cv-02232-AW (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2010).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
the
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
We previously granted a certificate of appealability as to
Tshiwala’s Fourth Amendment claims and denied a certificate of
appealability and dismissed the appeal as to all remaining
claims.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?