US v. Linwood Parker

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:07-cr-00068-RBS-JEB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998589910].. [10-7577]

Appeal: 10-7577

Document: 9

Date Filed: 05/16/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7577

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LINWOOD COLA PARKER, a/k/a Lenny,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:07-cr-00068-RBS-JEB-1)

Submitted:

April 29, 2011

Decided:

May 16, 2011

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linwood Cola Parker, Appellant Pro Se.
Gurney Wingate Grant,
II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Darryl
James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-7577

Document: 9

Date Filed: 05/16/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Linwood

Cola

Parker

seeks

to

appeal

the

district

court’s order denying his motion to recuse or disqualify.
court

may

exercise

jurisdiction

only

over

final

This

orders,

28

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

The

order Parker seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2