US v. Brooks Terrell
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:99-cr-00610-HMH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998536688] [10-7608]
<![CDATA[
US v. Brooks Terrell
Doc. 0
Case: 10-7608
Document: 7
Date Filed: 03/03/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7608
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. BROOKS JAMES TERRELL, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00610-HMH-1)
Submitted:
February 24, 2011
Decided:
March 3, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brooks James Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-7608
Document: 7
Date Filed: 03/03/2011
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Brooks order denying James 18 Terrell U.S.C. appeals the district (2006) court's for
his
§ 3582(c)(2)
motion
reduction of sentence. reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated United States v. Terrell, No. 7:99-cr3, 2010). We dispense with oral
by the district court. 00610-HMH-1 (D.S.C.
Nov.
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
