US v. Mark Clifton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:96-cr-00062-H-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998600899]. Mailed to: Mark Clifton. [10-7657]

Appeal: 10-7657

Document: 7

Date Filed: 05/31/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7657

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK CLIFTON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (7:96-cr-00062-H-2)

Submitted:

May 26, 2011

Decided:

May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Clifton, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-7657

Document: 7

Date Filed: 05/31/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mark

Clifton

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying Clifton a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)

(2006).

reversible error.

We

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
00062-H-2

have

(E.D.N.C.

United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr-

Nov.

9,

2010).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2