Peter Diugwu v. Officials at Powhatan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01037-GBL-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998536750] [10-7685]

Download PDF
Peter Diugwu v. Officials at Powhatan Doc. 0 Case: 10-7685 Document: 11 Date Filed: 03/03/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7685 PETER DIUGWU, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. OFFICIALS AT POWHATAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Medical Staff and Correctional Officials; OFFICIALS AT POCAHONTAS STATE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Medical Staff and Correctional Officials; DEEP MEADOW CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Medical Staff and Correctional Officials, Defendants ­ Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01037-GBL-TCB) Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 3, 2011 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Diugwu, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-7685 Document: 11 Date Filed: 03/03/2011 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Peter dismissing Diugwu appeals the his 42 district U.S.C. court's § 1983 order (2006) We without prejudice complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diugwu v. Officials at Powhatan Corr. Ctr., No. 1:10-cv- 01037-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2010; entered Nov. 16, 2010). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?