Larry Patterson v. Timothy Kaine

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:08-cv-00490-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998624910]. Mailed to: Larry Patterson. [10-7703]

Appeal: 10-7703

Document: 26

Date Filed: 07/05/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7703

LARRY E. PATTERSON
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
ELMO A. REID, JR.; JAMES R. CLARK,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TIMOTHY M. KAINE, Governor of the State of Virginia, sued in
his official and individual capacity; JOHN W. MARSHALL,
Secretary of Public Safety of Virginia, sued in his official
and individual capacity; HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson of the
Virginia Parole Board, sued in her official and individual
capacity,
Defendants – Appellees,
___________________________
DEREK T. FRITZINGER; MELVIN C. DODSON,
Movants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00490-JRS)

Submitted:

June 30, 2011

Decided:

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

July 5, 2011

Appeal: 10-7703

Document: 26

Date Filed: 07/05/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 10-7703

Document: 26

Date Filed: 07/05/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Larry E. Patterson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for relief judgment, filed pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b).

On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Patterson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, Patterson has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3