Samuel Brown v. Anthony Hathaway

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-ct-03004-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998561866]. Mailed to: Samuel Brown. [10-7720]

Case: 10-7720

Document: 15

Date Filed: 04/06/2011

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7720

SAMUEL L. BROWN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY HATHAWAY; LILLIAN GILLIAM; LT. BIGGS; MS. WALTON,
Defendants– Appellees,
and
A. SPRUILL; GIBBS; SANDERLIN; C/O BROWN,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03004-BO)

Submitted:

March 31, 2011

Decided:

April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
Appellees.

Yvonne
North

Bulluck Ricci,
Carolina,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Case: 10-7720

Document: 15

Date Filed: 04/06/2011

Page: 2

PER CURIAM:
Samuel L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Brown

V.

Hathaway,

No.

Sept. 29, 2009; Nov. 18, 2010).

5:09-ct-03004-BO

(E.D.N.C.

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2