Antonio Randolph v. L. Rosario

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for stay pending appeal [998509448-2] Originating case number: 9:09-cv-03166-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998581513]. Mailed to: Antonio Randolph. [10-7731]

Appeal: 10-7731

Document: 14

Date Filed: 05/03/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7731

ANTONIO MARTINELLE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
L. FUERTES ROSARIO, HSA-MLP; JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden; G.
LINK, Physicians Assistant,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(9:09-cv-03166-RMG)

Submitted:

April 28, 2011

Decided:

May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Martinelle Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-7731

Document: 14

Date Filed: 05/03/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Antonio
court’s
judge

order

and

Martinelle

accepting

dismissing

Randolph

the

appeals

recommendation

without

prejudice

of

the
the

Randolph’s

district
magistrate
42

U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies.
error.
district

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.

Randolph

(D.S.C. Dec. 1, 2010).
dispense

with

oral

v.

Rosario,

No.

9:09-cv-03166-RMG

We deny Randolph’s motion for stay and

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2