Benjamin Davis v. W. Roadheaver

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998562026] Mailed to: Benjamin Davis, III. [10-7746]

Download PDF
Case: 10-7746 Document: 14 Date Filed: 04/06/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7746 BENJAMIN DAVIS, III, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. W. ROADHEAVER, Cpl.; SOLSTICE, Cpl.; TYLER, Capt.; DURST, Lt.,; LLEWELYN, Lt.; CROSS, Sgt., Individually and in their Official Capacities, Defendants – Appellees, v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Party-in-Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01936-WDQ) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Case: 10-7746 Document: 14 Date Filed: 04/06/2011 Page: 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-7746 Document: 14 Date Filed: 04/06/2011 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Davis, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Davis v. Roadheaver, No. 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2010); Davis v. Roadheaver, No. 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. July 16, 2010). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?