Benjamin Davis v. W. Roadheaver
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998562026] Mailed to: Benjamin Davis, III. [10-7746]
Case: 10-7746
Document: 14
Date Filed: 04/06/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7746
BENJAMIN DAVIS, III,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
W. ROADHEAVER, Cpl.; SOLSTICE, Cpl.; TYLER, Capt.; DURST, Lt.,;
LLEWELYN, Lt.; CROSS, Sgt., Individually and in their Official
Capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
v.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:09-cv-01936-WDQ)
Submitted:
March 31, 2011
Decided:
April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephanie Judith Lane
Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Case: 10-7746
Document: 14
Date Filed: 04/06/2011
Page: 2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Case: 10-7746
Document: 14
Date Filed: 04/06/2011
Page: 3
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin
Davis,
III,
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reversible
error.
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
Davis v. Roadheaver, No.
1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2010); Davis v. Roadheaver,
No. 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. July 16, 2010).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
the
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?