Terrell McCoy v. Amy Enloe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998507910-2] Originating case number: 9:09-cv-02958-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998630593]. Mailed to: Terrell McCoy. [10-7760]

Download PDF
Appeal: 10-7760 Document: 19 Date Filed: 07/13/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7760 TERRELL MCCOY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMY ENLOE, Correctional Correctional Correctional Correctional CORRECTIONS, Nurse-Doctor; CATHY JONES, Nurse Perry Institution; DEBORAH MURRELL, Nurse Perry Institution; MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden Perry Institution; VICTORIA BALOGUN, Nurse Perry Institution; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:09-cv-02958-RMG) Submitted: June 28, 2011 Decided: July 13, 2011 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrell McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 10-7760 Document: 19 Date Filed: 07/13/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Terrell McCoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. McCoy v. Enloe, No. 9:09-cv-02958-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 2010). We deny McCoy’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?