Terrell McCoy v. Amy Enloe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998507910-2] Originating case number: 9:09-cv-02958-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998630593]. Mailed to: Terrell McCoy. [10-7760]
Appeal: 10-7760
Document: 19
Date Filed: 07/13/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7760
TERRELL MCCOY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
AMY
ENLOE,
Correctional
Correctional
Correctional
Correctional
CORRECTIONS,
Nurse-Doctor;
CATHY
JONES,
Nurse
Perry
Institution; DEBORAH MURRELL, Nurse Perry
Institution; MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden Perry
Institution; VICTORIA BALOGUN, Nurse Perry
Institution; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (9:09-cv-02958-RMG)
Submitted:
June 28, 2011
Decided:
July 13, 2011
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrell McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 10-7760
Document: 19
Date Filed: 07/13/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Terrell
McCoy
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
We
have
Accordingly,
district
court.
McCoy v. Enloe, No. 9:09-cv-02958-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 2010).
We deny McCoy’s motion for a transcript at government expense
and dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?