Elsibeth McCoy v. Steve Canterbury

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00368 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998583510]. Mailed to: McCoy. [11-1017]

Appeal: 11-1017

Document: 13

Date Filed: 05/05/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1017

ELSIBETH BRANDEE MCCOY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STEVE CANTERBURY, Administrative Director for Supreme Court
of Appeals of West Virginia,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA; CABELL COUNTY
COURTHOUSE; BARBRA WILLS, Courthouse Administrator,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington.
Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00368)

Submitted:

May 2, 2011

Decided:

May 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elsibeth Brandee McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges,
Stephanie Shepherd, BYRNE, HEDGES & LYONS, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Appeal: 11-1017

Document: 13

Date Filed: 05/05/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-1017

Document: 13

Date Filed: 05/05/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Elsibeth

Brandee

McCoy

appeals

the

district

court’s

order dismissing her action filed under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(West 2003 & Supp. 2010).
no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm substantially for

the reasons stated by the district court.

McCoy v. Canterbury,

No. 3:10-cv-00368 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 20 & 21, 2010).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3