Anthony McNair v. Rocky Mount Police Department

Filing 920110309

<

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1036 ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. ROCKY MOUNT POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:10-cv-00544-FL) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Lee McNair, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Lee McNair appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) civil rights action. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised McNair that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The magistrate timely filing of specific is objections to to a judge's recommendation necessary preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been v. warned of the 766 Arn, consequences F.2d 474 841, U.S. of noncompliance. (4th Cir. (1985). 1985); Wright see Collins, Thomas v. 845-46 155 also 140, McNair has waived appellate review by failing to file Accordingly, specific objections after receiving proper notice. we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?