Leavon Reeves v. Owen & Sparrow, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01075-TSE-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998595457]. Mailed to: Leavon Reeves. [11-1067]

Appeal: 11-1067

Document: 19

Date Filed: 05/23/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1067

LEAVON Z. REEVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OWEN & SPARROW, LLC; TWO RIVERS LAW GROUP, PC; ELIZABETH
MCCUBBINS,
Chartis
Claims,
Inc.;
CHARTIS
CLAIMS,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01075-TSE-JFA)

Submitted:

May 19, 2011

Before TRAXLER,
Judges.

Chief

Decided:

Judge,

and

AGEE

and

May 23, 2011

KEENAN,

Circuit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leavon Z. Reeves, Appellant Pro Se.
John R. Lockard,
VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; John Elphinstone
McIntosh, Jr., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1067

Document: 19

Date Filed: 05/23/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Leavon Z. Reeves appeals the district court’s order
denying

relief

on

his

successive

dismissal of his civil complaint.
and find no reversible error.

motion

No.

reconsider

the

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.
LLC,

to

1:10-cv-01075-TSE-JFA

Reeves v. Owen & Sparrow,

(E.D.

Va.

Dec.

29,

2010).

Reeves’s motion for transcripts at the Government’s expense is
denied.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2