In Re: Lawrence Azure

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998515817-2]; denying Motion for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 [998515819-2] Originating case number: 5:08-cv-00286. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998567177]. Mailed to: Lawrence A. Azure. [11-1098]

Case: 11-1098

Document: 5

Date Filed: 04/13/2011

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1098

In Re:

LAWRENCE A. AZURE,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted:

March 22, 2011

(5:08-cv-00286)

Decided:

April 13, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence A. Azure, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Case: 11-1098

Document: 5

Date Filed: 04/13/2011

Page: 2

PER CURIAM:
Lawrence A. Azure petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
petition for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.
2010).

He seeks an order from this court directing the district

court to act.
warranted

Although we find that mandamus relief is not

because

of

the

recent

issuance

of

the

magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation, we deny the mandamus petition
without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if
the district court does not act expeditiously.
to proceed in forma pauperis.

We grant leave

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2