Rosemary Susko v. City of Weirton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cv-00001-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998658016].. [11-1114]

Appeal: 11-1114

Document: 23

Date Filed: 08/18/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1114
ROSEMARY SUSKO, d/b/a Rosemont Manor,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITY OF WEIRTON; MARK HARRIS; WILLIAM MILLER; ROD ROSNICK;
JIM MCHENRY; GARY DUFOUR; DEWEY GUIDA; TOM VIRTUE; BOB
ARANGO; BOB MRVOS; ETHEL YEAGER, as Executrix of the Estate
of John Yeager, deceased, substituted as a party in place of
John Yeager,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN YEAGER,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00001-FPS-JES)
Submitted:

August 10, 2011

Decided:

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

August 18, 2011

Appeal: 11-1114

Document: 23

Date Filed: 08/18/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Paul J. Harris, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant.
David
L. Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-1114

Document: 23

Date Filed: 08/18/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Rosemary Susko appeals the district court’s judgment
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on her 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) claims against them.
and

find

no

reversible

error.

district court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the record
Accordingly,

we

affirm

the

See Susko v. City of Weirton, No.

5:09-cv-00001-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 20, 2011).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3