Kwame Gyamfi v. Wells-Fargo-Wachovia Bank
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-03001-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998665246]. Mailed to: Kwame Gyamfi. [11-1116]
Appeal: 11-1116
Document: 12
Date Filed: 08/29/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1116
KWAME GYAMFI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS-FARGO-WACHOVIA BANK; WELLS FARGO BANK, CORP,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-03001-DKC)
Submitted:
August 25, 2011
Decided:
August 29, 2011
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kwame Gyamfi, Appellant Pro
CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE,
Appellee.
Se.
Robert A. Gaumont, WOMBLE
PLLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*
The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46)d) (2006).
Appeal: 11-1116
Document: 12
Date Filed: 08/29/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kwame
denying
his
Gyamfi
motion
appeals
for
the
a
district
default
court’s
judgment,
orders
denying
reconsideration of that order, and dismissing his claims filed
under the Bank Secrecy Act, the United States Patriot Act, and
the Right to Financial Privacy Act.
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Wachovia
Bank,
No.
8:09-cv-03001-DKC
Gyamfi v. Wells-Fargo(D.
Md.
Mar.
June 15, 2010, Dec. 14, 2010, & Jan. 31, 2011).
8,
2010,
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?