Kwame Gyamfi v. Wells-Fargo-Wachovia Bank

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-03001-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998665246]. Mailed to: Kwame Gyamfi. [11-1116]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1116 Document: 12 Date Filed: 08/29/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1116 KWAME GYAMFI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS-FARGO-WACHOVIA BANK; WELLS FARGO BANK, CORP, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-03001-DKC) Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kwame Gyamfi, Appellant Pro CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, Appellee. Se. Robert A. Gaumont, WOMBLE PLLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. * The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46)d) (2006). Appeal: 11-1116 Document: 12 Date Filed: 08/29/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kwame denying his Gyamfi motion appeals for the a district default court’s judgment, orders denying reconsideration of that order, and dismissing his claims filed under the Bank Secrecy Act, the United States Patriot Act, and the Right to Financial Privacy Act. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wachovia Bank, No. 8:09-cv-03001-DKC Gyamfi v. Wells-Fargo(D. Md. Mar. June 15, 2010, Dec. 14, 2010, & Jan. 31, 2011). 8, 2010, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?