Douglas Willard v. Karen Kunda

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00326-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998601050]. Mailed to: Debra Willard, Douglas E. Willard, Philip J. Sweitzer. [11-1120]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1120 Document: 24 Date Filed: 05/31/2011 Page: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1120 DOUGLAS E. WILLARD; DEBRA WILLARD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and WHITETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. KAREN KUNDA; ADAM KUNDA; HACK'S POINT GENERAL STORE, INCORPORATED; CECIL BANCORP, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Cecil Bank; CHARLES F. SPOSATO, SR.; MARY B. HALSEY; SANDRA D. FELTMAN; ANTHONY MOSS; BRIAN LOCKHART; CECIL BANK, Defendants - Appellees, and WAYNE HOLMQUIST; NANCY HOLMQUIST, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00326-JFM) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. May 31, 2011 Appeal: 11-1120 Document: 24 Date Filed: 05/31/2011 Page: 2 of 3 Douglas E. Willard and Debra Willard, Appellants Pro Se. David Matthew Wyand, ROSENBERG, MARTIN & GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 11-1120 Document: 24 Date Filed: 05/31/2011 Page: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Douglas district E. Willard court’s orders and Debra dismissing denying their motion to reconsider. and find no reversible error. Willard appeal the civil action and their We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Willard v. Kunda, No. 1:10-cv-00326-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 11, 2010 & Jan. 14, 2011). dispense with oral argument because the facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?