Douglas Willard v. Karen Kunda
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00326-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998601050]. Mailed to: Debra Willard, Douglas E. Willard, Philip J. Sweitzer. [11-1120]
Appeal: 11-1120
Document: 24
Date Filed: 05/31/2011
Page: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1120
DOUGLAS E. WILLARD; DEBRA WILLARD,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
WHITETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
KAREN KUNDA; ADAM KUNDA; HACK'S POINT GENERAL STORE,
INCORPORATED; CECIL BANCORP, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Cecil Bank;
CHARLES F. SPOSATO, SR.; MARY B. HALSEY; SANDRA D. FELTMAN;
ANTHONY MOSS; BRIAN LOCKHART; CECIL BANK,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WAYNE HOLMQUIST; NANCY HOLMQUIST,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00326-JFM)
Submitted:
May 26, 2011
Decided:
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
May 31, 2011
Appeal: 11-1120
Document: 24
Date Filed: 05/31/2011
Page: 2 of 3
Douglas E. Willard and Debra Willard, Appellants Pro Se. David
Matthew Wyand, ROSENBERG, MARTIN & GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 11-1120
Document: 24
Date Filed: 05/31/2011
Page: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Douglas
district
E.
Willard
court’s
orders
and
Debra
dismissing
denying their motion to reconsider.
and find no reversible error.
Willard
appeal
the
civil
action
and
their
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Willard v. Kunda, No.
1:10-cv-00326-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 11, 2010 & Jan. 14, 2011).
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?