Douglas Willard v. Karen Kunda

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00326-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998601050]. Mailed to: Debra Willard, Douglas E. Willard, Philip J. Sweitzer. [11-1120]

Appeal: 11-1120

Document: 24

Date Filed: 05/31/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1120

DOUGLAS E. WILLARD; DEBRA WILLARD,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
WHITETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
KAREN KUNDA; ADAM KUNDA; HACK'S POINT GENERAL STORE,
INCORPORATED; CECIL BANCORP, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Cecil Bank;
CHARLES F. SPOSATO, SR.; MARY B. HALSEY; SANDRA D. FELTMAN;
ANTHONY MOSS; BRIAN LOCKHART; CECIL BANK,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WAYNE HOLMQUIST; NANCY HOLMQUIST,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00326-JFM)

Submitted:

May 26, 2011

Decided:

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

May 31, 2011

Appeal: 11-1120

Document: 24

Date Filed: 05/31/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Douglas E. Willard and Debra Willard, Appellants Pro Se. David
Matthew Wyand, ROSENBERG, MARTIN & GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-1120

Document: 24

Date Filed: 05/31/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Douglas
district

E.

Willard

court’s

orders

and

Debra

dismissing

denying their motion to reconsider.
and find no reversible error.

Willard

appeal

the

civil

action

and

their

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

Willard v. Kunda, No.

1:10-cv-00326-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 11, 2010 & Jan. 14, 2011).
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3