Access for the Disabled, Inc. v. J.C. Penney Properties, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-01395-CBD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998720394].. [11-1135]
Appeal: 11-1135
Document: 25
Date Filed: 11/10/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1135
ACCESS FOR THE DISABLED, INCORPORATED, a Florida not for
profit corporation; DENISE PAYNE, Individually,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
J.C. PENNEY PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(8:09-cv-01395-CBD)
Submitted:
October 20, 2011
Decided:
November 10, 2011
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Bacon, THOMAS B. BACON, PA, Cooper City, Florida, for
Appellants.
Christopher R. Dunn, John W. Leonard, DECARO,
DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1135
Document: 25
Date Filed: 11/10/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Denise Payne and Access for the Disabled, Inc., appeal
the
district
under
Title
U.S.C.
§§
court’s
III
of
orders
the
12181-12189
dismissing
Americans
(2006),
reviewed
claims
Disabilities
denying
the
their
record
arising
Act,
motion
and
find
42
for
reconsideration.
We
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
have
and
with
their
no
Access for the Disabled, Inc. v. J.C.
Penney Props., Inc., No. 8:09-cv-01395-CBD (D. Md. Dec. 2, 2010;
Jan. 20, 2011).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?