Access for the Disabled, Inc. v. J.C. Penney Properties, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:09-cv-01395-CBD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998720394].. [11-1135]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1135 Document: 25 Date Filed: 11/10/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1135 ACCESS FOR THE DISABLED, INCORPORATED, a Florida not for profit corporation; DENISE PAYNE, Individually, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. J.C. PENNEY PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (8:09-cv-01395-CBD) Submitted: October 20, 2011 Decided: November 10, 2011 Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas B. Bacon, THOMAS B. BACON, PA, Cooper City, Florida, for Appellants. Christopher R. Dunn, John W. Leonard, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1135 Document: 25 Date Filed: 11/10/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Denise Payne and Access for the Disabled, Inc., appeal the district under Title U.S.C. §§ court’s III of orders the 12181-12189 dismissing Americans (2006), reviewed claims Disabilities denying the their record arising Act, motion and find 42 for reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. have and with their no Access for the Disabled, Inc. v. J.C. Penney Props., Inc., No. 8:09-cv-01395-CBD (D. Md. Dec. 2, 2010; Jan. 20, 2011). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?