George Pinanko v. Janet Napolitano

Filing

UNPUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998706282].. [11-1169]

Appeal: 11-1169

Document: 31

Date Filed: 10/21/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1169

GEORGE OSAM PINANKO; STELLA OPOKU,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JANET
NAPOLITANO,
Secretary,
Department
of
Homeland
Security; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services; SARAH TAYLOR, Director, Washington
District Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted:

October 12, 2011

Decided:

October 21, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,
Virginia, for Appellant.
Neil H. MacBride, United States
Attorney, Anna E. Cross, Assistant United States Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1169

Document: 31

Date Filed: 10/21/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
George

Osam

Pinanko

and

Stella

Opoku

appeal

the

district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their Petition
for Writ of Mandamus or for Review of Agency Action under the
Administrative Procedure Act.
find

no

reasons

reversible

error.

stated

the

by

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

district

we

court.

affirm
See

for

the

Pinanko

v.

Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2011).
We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2