Vera Harper v. United Services Automobile
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cv-00478-LO-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998692908]. Mailed to: Vera Harper. [11-1193]
Appeal: 11-1193
Document: 28
Date Filed: 10/04/2011
Page: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1193
VERA
C.
HARPER,
on
her
behalf
and
as
personal
representative of the Estate of Wilson Clark Harper,
Deceased; DAVID A. HARPER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a USAA; STEVE
LEE; J. LOUIS BLANCO; STEPHEN HORVATH; JANICE BUCHMAN; JUDGE
ROUSCH, Circuit Court Judge; KEITH, Circuit Court Judge;
JUDGE WOLDRIDGE; SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; DOES 1-50;
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN; JOHN THOMAS FREY; DAVID SCHELL;
MARCUS WILLIAMS, Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge; THE
FAIRFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; PATRICIA H. HARRINGTON, Clerk
of the Virginia Supreme Court; VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT;
TRICHILO BANCROFT MCGAVIN HORVATH AND JUDKINS PC; ALAN
DICKEY, Seminole County Circuit Court Judge; NANCY ALLEY,
Seminole Circuit County Judge; CLAYTON SIMMONS, Seminole
Circuit Court Judge; ROBERT WOHN, JR., Brevard County
Circuit Court Judge; JAMES PERRY, Florida Supreme Court
Justice; JANICE BUCHMAN; JOHN C. PAPPAS; ERIC DICKEY; BUTLER
PAPPAS WEIHMULLER KATZ CRAIG LLP; JOANN MARIE STALCUP;
FLORIDA BAR; ROBERT PEGG, Indian River County Circuit Court
Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:08-cv-00478-LO-TRJ)
Submitted:
September 29, 2011
Decided:
October 4, 2011
Appeal: 11-1193
Document: 28
Date Filed: 10/04/2011
Page: 2 of 3
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vera C. Harper; David A. Harper, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 11-1193
Document: 28
Date Filed: 10/04/2011
Page: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Vera
C.
Harper
and
David
A.
Harper
appeal
the
magistrate judge’s order denying their motion for leave to file
a third amended complaint, the district court’s order accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing
without prejudice their second amended complaint for failure to
serve
and
the
district court’s subsequent order denying reconsideration.
We
have
the
defendants
reviewed
the
under
record
Fed.
and
R.
find
Civ.
no
P.
4(m),
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Harper v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, No. 1:08-cv-00478-
LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2010; Jan. 20, 2011; Feb. 4, 2011).
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?