Greg Givens v. Mitch Tolson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00909-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998644129]. Mailed to: Givens. [11-1198]
Appeal: 11-1198
Document: 5
Date Filed: 08/01/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1198
GREG GIVENS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MITCH TOLSON; RICHARD A. HAYHURST; RICHARD M. ADAMS, SR.;
JANE DOE I; JOHN DOE I,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00909-HEH)
Submitted:
July 28, 2011
Decided:
August 1, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1198
Document: 5
Date Filed: 08/01/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Greg
Givens
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
(E.D.
Va.
Jan.
We have reviewed the record and find no
10,
Givens v. Tolson, No. 3:10-cv-00909-HEH
2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?