Greg Givens v. Mitch Tolson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00909-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998644129]. Mailed to: Givens. [11-1198]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1198 Document: 5 Date Filed: 08/01/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1198 GREG GIVENS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MITCH TOLSON; RICHARD A. HAYHURST; RICHARD M. ADAMS, SR.; JANE DOE I; JOHN DOE I, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00909-HEH) Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1198 Document: 5 Date Filed: 08/01/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Greg Givens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D. Va. Jan. We have reviewed the record and find no 10, Givens v. Tolson, No. 3:10-cv-00909-HEH 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?