In re: Jeffrey Young-Bey

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998539324-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998539323-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cv-02722-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998581122]. Mailed to: Jeffrey Young-Bey. [11-1202]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1202 Document: 4 Date Filed: 05/03/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1202 In Re: JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:08-cv-02722-JFM) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey M. Young-Bey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1202 Document: 4 Date Filed: 05/03/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey M. Young-Bey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Young-Bey’s petition on March 14, 2011. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Young-Bey’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. in forma pauperis. facts and materials legal before We grant leave to proceed We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?