In re: Jeffrey Young-Bey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998539324-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998539323-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cv-02722-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998581122]. Mailed to: Jeffrey Young-Bey. [11-1202]
Appeal: 11-1202
Document: 4
Date Filed: 05/03/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1202
In Re:
JEFFREY M. YOUNG-BEY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:08-cv-02722-JFM)
Submitted:
April 28, 2011
Decided:
May 3, 2011
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1202
Document: 4
Date Filed: 05/03/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition.
He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act.
Our review of the
district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied
Young-Bey’s petition on March 14, 2011.
Accordingly, because
the district court has recently decided Young-Bey’s case, we
deny the mandamus petition as moot.
in forma pauperis.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We grant leave to proceed
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?