Cherry Reaves v. Housing Authority of the City

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00662-RJC-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998692846]. Mailed to: Reaves and Fitzgerald. [11-1246]

Appeal: 11-1246

Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/04/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1246

CHERRY REAVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NC,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00662-RJC-DSC)

Submitted:

September 29, 2011

Decided:

October 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cherry Reaves, Appellant Pro Se.
Amy Fitzgerald, CRANFILL,
SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1246

Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/04/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Cherry

Reaves

seeks

to

appeal

order denying her motion for a hearing.

the

district

court’s

This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
to

appeal

is

neither

a

final

interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

order

The order Reaves seeks
nor

an

appealable

Accordingly, we dismiss the

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED

2