William Sommerville v. Officer Jody Dobson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cv-00067-JBF-FBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998714470].. [11-1334]

Appeal: 11-1334

Document: 21

Date Filed: 11/02/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1334

WILLIAM SOMMERVILLE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JODY DOBSON, Officer; JAMES LEDBETTER, Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Jerome B. Friedman,
Senior District Judge. (4:10-cv-00067-JBF-FBS)

Submitted:

October 25, 2011

Decided:

November 2, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd M. Gaynor, TAYLOR & WALKER, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellant. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, Attorney General of
Virginia, E. Duncan Getchell, Solicitor General of Virginia,
Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, Catherine
Crooks Hill, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond,
Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, Virginia
Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1334

Document: 21

Date Filed: 11/02/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William Sommerville appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Sommerville v. Dobson, No. 4:10-cv-00067-JBF-FBS (E.D.

Va. Mar. 8, 2011).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2