Donald Trantham, Jr. v. Henry County Sheriff's Office

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cv-00058-jlk-mfu Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998614956]. Mailed to: Trantham. [11-1337]

Appeal: 11-1337

Document: 23

Date Filed: 06/20/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1337

DONALD TRANTHAM, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, County
of Henry; GARDNER GARDNER BARROW & SHARPE; MARTINSVILLE,
VIRGINIA
POLICE
DEPARTMENT;
VIRGINIA
STATE
POLICE;
MARTINSVILLE
HENRY
COUNTY
MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL;
DRUG
ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,
Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:10-cv-00058-jlk-mfu)

Submitted:

June 16, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

GREGORY,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

June 20, 2011

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Trantham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Jim H. Guynn, Jr.,
GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia; Philip Grahem
Gardner,
GARDNER
BARROW
SHARPE
&
REYNOLDS,
Martinsville,
Virginia; Martha White Medley, Michael Anthony Nicholas, DANIEL,
MEDLEY & KIRBY, PC, Danville, Virginia; George Walerian
Chabalewski, Christina Nicole Gilliam, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Nora Beth Dorsey, Jodi

Appeal: 11-1337

Document: 23

Date Filed: 06/20/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Beth Simopoulos, HANCOCK DANIEL JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen,
Virginia; Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney,
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-1337

Document: 23

Date Filed: 06/20/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Donald

Trantham,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s

order dismissing Trantham’s claims against all Defendants.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Trantham v. Henry Cnty. Sheriff’s Office, No. 4:10-cv-

00058-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2011).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3