Patrick McHugh v. Mayor and City Council
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01214-BPG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998820927].. [11-1340]
Appeal: 11-1340
Document: 46
Date Filed: 03/29/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1340
PATRICK MCHUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; ANGELA M. BUTLER; ANDRE
MOSELEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge.
(1:09-cv-01214-BPG)
Submitted:
February 17, 2012
Decided:
March 29, 2012
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John B. Stolarz, THE STOLARZ LAW FIRM, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellant. George Nilson, City Solicitor, William Phelan, Chief
Solicitor, Sabrina Willis, Assistant Solicitor, BALTIMORE CITY
DEPARTMENT OF LAW, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1340
Document: 46
Date Filed: 03/29/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick
McHugh
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Mayor and City Council
of Baltimore and individual Defendants Angela Butler and Andrew
Moseley
in
this
employment
discrimination
action
pursuant
to
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42
U.S.C.
§
2000e-2000e-17
(West
2003
&
Supp.
2010).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *
McHugh
v.
01214-BPG
Mayor
(D.
and
Md.
City
Mar.
Council
24,
of
2011).
Baltimore,
We
have
No.
dispense
See
1:09-cv-
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
73, the parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the
magistrate judge.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?