Edward C. Dedrick v. John Berry
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:07-cv-00429-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998671547]. Mailed to: Dedrick. [11-1358]
Appeal: 11-1358
Document: 11
Date Filed: 09/07/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1358
EDWARD C. DEDRICK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN BERRY, Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management;
JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the U.S. Army,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:07-cv-00429-WDQ)
Submitted:
August 25, 2011
Decided:
September 7, 2011
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward C. Dedrick, Appellant Pro Se.
Neil R. White, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1358
Document: 11
Date Filed: 09/07/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Edward C. Dedrick appeals the district court’s order
denying
his
summary
judgment
motion
and
granting
Defendants’
cross-motion for summary judgment on Dedrick’s action seeking
review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s order denying his
claim for disability retirement benefits under the Civil Service
Reform Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq. (West 2007 & Supp. 2011).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
error.
See Dedrick
v. Berry, No. 1:07-cv-00429-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2011).
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?