Stephen Sieber v. The Washington Post Companie

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to consolidate case (Local Rule 12(b)) [998688531-2] Originating case number: 8:11-cv-00758-RWT,0:07-bk-21192,0:11-ap-113 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998692728]. Mailed to: Christopher Petito, Derrick Sieber, Leander Barnhill, and Ronald Williams. [11-1364]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1364 Document: 9 Date Filed: 10/04/2011 Page: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1364 STEPHEN C. SIEBER, Movant/Debtor; DERRICK S. Movant/Party in Interest; CHRISTOPHER Movant/Creditor; RONALD WILLIAMS, Movant/Creditor, SIEBER, PETITO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and CHARLES LANGDON, Movant/Creditor, Plaintiff, v. THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANIES; ANGIE'S LIST; JEANNE CROUSE, Assistant U.S. Trustee - Greenbelt; LEANDER BARNHILL, Counsel for Assistant U.S. Trustee; CHERYL ROSE; JAMES HOFFMAN, Special Counsel for Trustee; OFFIT/KIRMAN, Law Firm of Trustee's Counsel; KEITH HAVENS; WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY, Law Firm for the Washington Post; CLARKSON MCDOW, Region IV U.S. Trustee; ICE MILLER, LLP, Law Firm for Angie's List; BRACEWELL AND GIULIANI, LLP, Second Law Firm for Angie's List; PAUL POGUE, c/o Anthony H. Anikeef, Bracewell & Guiliani, LLP; THOMAS MEADOWS, c/o Anthony H. Anikeef, Bracewell & Guiliani, LLP; JOHN KELLY, c/o Kevin Hardy, Williams & Connolly, LLP; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, c/o Todd Kim, Esq.; ROBERT HARRIS, c/o Todd King, Esq.; JOHN POOLE, c/o Christopher Hoge, Esq.; TODD JOHANNSEN, c/o Charles Cate, Esq.; MONICA HAMMOCK, c/o Dale Sanders, Esq., Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11cv-00758-RWT) Appeal: 11-1364 Document: 9 Submitted: Date Filed: 10/04/2011 September 29, 2011 Page: 2 of 3 Decided: October 4, 2011 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen Charles Sieber, Derrick S. Sieber, Christopher Petito, Ronald Williams, Appellants Pro Se. James Martin Hoffman, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 11-1364 Document: 9 Date Filed: 10/04/2011 Page: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to withdraw the order of reference of Stephen Sieber’s bankruptcy case to the bankruptcy court and denying Sieber’s proposed order. motion requesting the court to adopt his This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Appellants’ motion to consolidate this appeal with Appeal No. 11-1857, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?