Taylor Witt v. Cable Ad Concept

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cv-03778-HFF Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998638954]. Mailed to: Taylor Stone Witt. [11-1400]

Appeal: 11-1400

Document: 11

Date Filed: 07/25/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1400

TAYLOR STONE WITT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CABLE AD CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation;
NORTHLAND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Washington
corporation,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CABLE
AD
CONCEPTS;
CORPORATION,

NORTHLAND

CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(8:08-cv-03778-HFF)

Submitted:

July 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

GREGORY,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

July 25, 2011

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taylor Stone Witt, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Allen Bright,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South

Appeal: 11-1400

Document: 11

Date Filed: 07/25/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-1400

Document: 11

Date Filed: 07/25/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Taylor Stone Witt appeals the district court’s order
denying as untimely her motion to amend her complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

As Witt filed

her motion after the district court dismissed her complaint with
prejudice, the motion was clearly untimely.
affirm.
legal
before

Accordingly, we

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3