William Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping Center, Inc
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998889387].. [11-1486]
Appeal: 11-1486
Doc: 31
Filed: 07/06/2012
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1486
WILLIAM NORKUNAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PARK ROAD SHOPPING CENTER, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC)
Submitted:
June 8, 2012
Decided:
July 6, 2012
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Bacon, THOMAS B. BACON, PA, Cooper City, Florida;
Christopher D. Lane, Clemmons, North Carolina, for Appellant. G.
Bryan Adams, III, Philip M. Van Hoy, VAN HOY, REUTLINGER, ADAMS
& DUNN, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1486
Doc: 31
Filed: 07/06/2012
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William
Norkunas
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing for lack of standing his claims under Title III of
the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189
(2006).
We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the
joint appendix and find no legal or factual basis to reverse the
district court’s conclusion that Norkunas failed to plead facts
sufficient to state an actual or imminent injury or to question
in
this
case
the
court’s
Article III standing.
refusal
to
broaden
the
bases
for
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping
stated by the district court.
Ctr., Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?