William Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping Center, Inc

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998889387].. [11-1486]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1486 Doc: 31 Filed: 07/06/2012 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1486 WILLIAM NORKUNAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PARK ROAD SHOPPING CENTER, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC) Submitted: June 8, 2012 Decided: July 6, 2012 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas B. Bacon, THOMAS B. BACON, PA, Cooper City, Florida; Christopher D. Lane, Clemmons, North Carolina, for Appellant. G. Bryan Adams, III, Philip M. Van Hoy, VAN HOY, REUTLINGER, ADAMS & DUNN, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1486 Doc: 31 Filed: 07/06/2012 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William Norkunas appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of standing his claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006). We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no legal or factual basis to reverse the district court’s conclusion that Norkunas failed to plead facts sufficient to state an actual or imminent injury or to question in this case the court’s Article III standing. refusal to broaden the bases for Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping stated by the district court. Ctr., Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?