Lorraine King v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cv-01515 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998701410]. Mailed to: Lorraine King. [11-1531]

Appeal: 11-1531

Document: 21

Date Filed: 10/17/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1531

LORRAINE KING,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
R. Clarke VanDervort,
Magistrate Judge. (5:09-cv-01515)

Submitted:

September 27, 2011

Decided:

October 17, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorraine King, Appellant Pro Se.
Shannon G. Petty, SOCIAL
SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania,
for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1531

Document: 21

Date Filed: 10/17/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lorraine

King

appeals

the

magistrate

judge’s

order

affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny King disability
and supplemental security income insurance benefits. *
uphold

the

decision

to

benefits

the

decision

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart,

434

650,

(per

correct

curiam).

law

is

applied.

(4th Cir. 2005)

and

the

by

653

evidence

if

supported

F.3d

substantial

deny

We must

We

was

have

thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge.

King v. Astrue, No. 5:09-cv-01515 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 3,

2011 & July 8, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

the

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction
magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

2

of

the