Stephen Yelverton v. Yelverton Farms, Limited
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cv-00331-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998724862]. Mailed to: John Bircher, John Marshall, Natalie Walker, Stephen Yelverton. [11-1553]
Appeal: 11-1553
Document: 18
Date Filed: 11/17/2011
Page: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1553
STEPHEN THOMAS YELVERTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WENDELL W. WEBSTER, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee in
Bankruptcy for Steven Thomas Yelverton,
Plaintiff,
v.
YELVERTON FARMS, LTD; PHYLLIS EDMUNDSON; CHARLES EDMUNDSON;
DEBORAH MARM,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
WADE H. ATKINSON, JR.,
Intervenor.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00331-FL)
Submitted:
November 15, 2011
Decided:
November 17, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Appeal: 11-1553
Document: 18
Date Filed: 11/17/2011
Page: 2 of 3
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Thomas Yelverton, Appellant Pro Se.
Ronald L. Gibson,
ERWIN & ELEAZER, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina; Natalie S.
Walker, WEBSTER, FREDERICKSON & BRACKSHAW, Washington, D.C.;
John C. Bircher, III, WHITE & ALLEN, PA, New Bern, North
Carolina; John Pierce Marshall, Matthew Scott Sullivan, WHITE &
ALLEN, PA, Kinston, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 11-1553
Document: 18
Date Filed: 11/17/2011
Page: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Thomas Yelverton seeks to appeal the district
court orders determining that he lacked standing, denying his
motion
to
amend,
plaintiff,
and
substituting
amending
the
case
the
bankruptcy
caption.
This
trustee
as
court
may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
Yelverton
seeks
to
appeal
are
neither
final
appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
The orders
orders
nor
Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
the
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?