Rudolph McCollum, Sr. v. Transport Workers Union

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00210-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998665299]. Mailed to: McCollum. [11-1576]

Appeal: 11-1576

Document: 9

Date Filed: 08/29/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1576

RUDOLPH MCCOLLUM, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Local 527,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
GENCO INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00210-JRS)

Submitted:

August 25, 2011

Decided:

August 29, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rudolph McCollum, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Richard S. Edelman,
O’DONNELL, SCHWARTZ & ANDERSON, PC, Washington, D.C., James J.
Vergara, Jr., VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1576

Document: 9

Date Filed: 08/29/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Rudolph
order

McCollum,

dismissing

action.

as

Sr.,

untimely

appeals
his

the

district

employment

court’s

discrimination

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised

in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because

McCollum’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district court’s disposition, McCollum has forfeited appellate
review
district

of

the

court’s

court’s

order.

judgment.

Accordingly,

We

dispense

with

we

affirm

oral

the

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2