Nikki Thompson v. City of Danville, Virginia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998693865-2], denying Motion for other relief [998678485-2] Originating case number: 4:10-cv-00012-JLK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998739313]. Mailed to: Nikki Thompson. [11-1669]
Appeal: 11-1669
Document: 19
Date Filed: 12/08/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1669
NIKKI THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DANVILLE, VIRGINIA; CITY OF DANVILLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; V. T. BROWN, in his capacity as a Police Officer
of the City of Danville Police Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:10-cv-00012-JLK)
Submitted:
November 28, 2011
Decided:
December 8, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nikki Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Anthony Nicholas,
DANIEL, MEDLEY & KIRBY, PC, Danville, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1669
Document: 19
Date Filed: 12/08/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Nikki
Thompson
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
(W.D.
Thompson
Va.
June
3,
v.
City
of
2011).
Danville,
The
motions
No.
4:10-cv-00012-JLK
for
consideration
discovery information and for relief are denied.
of
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?