Nikki Thompson v. City of Danville, Virginia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998693865-2], denying Motion for other relief [998678485-2] Originating case number: 4:10-cv-00012-JLK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998739313]. Mailed to: Nikki Thompson. [11-1669]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1669 Document: 19 Date Filed: 12/08/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1669 NIKKI THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF DANVILLE, VIRGINIA; CITY OF DANVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; V. T. BROWN, in his capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Danville Police Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:10-cv-00012-JLK) Submitted: November 28, 2011 Decided: December 8, 2011 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nikki Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anthony Nicholas, DANIEL, MEDLEY & KIRBY, PC, Danville, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1669 Document: 19 Date Filed: 12/08/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Nikki Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (W.D. Thompson Va. June 3, v. City of 2011). Danville, The motions No. 4:10-cv-00012-JLK for consideration discovery information and for relief are denied. of We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?