Pepi Schafler

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-01893-PJM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998724833]. Mailed to: Pepi Schafler. [11-1672]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1672 Document: 14 Date Filed: 11/17/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1672 PEPI SCHAFLER, Plaintiff - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-01893-PJM) Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011 Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pepi Schafler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1672 Document: 14 Date Filed: 11/17/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Pepi Schafler seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action styled as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and denying reconsideration. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 11, 2011. 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on June 13, Because Schafler failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?