Roy Rippeon v. Frederick County Board of Ed

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01225-WMN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998778850].. [11-1716]

Appeal: 11-1716

Document: 23

Date Filed: 02/02/2012

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1716

ROY RIPPEON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; LINDA D. BURGEE,
individually and in her official capacity as Superintendent
of Frederick County Public Schools; ROBERT R. HAGANS,
individually and in his official capacity as Senior Human
Resources Manager of Frederick County Public Schools; ROBERT
JOHNSON, individually and in his official capacity as
Supervisor of Maintenance and Operations of Frederick County
Public Schools; ROBERT E. WILKINSON, individually and in his
official capacity as Director of Maintenance and Operations
of Frederick County Public Schools,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CHRISTINE A. JACOBS, individually and in her official
capacity as Administrative Secretary of the Human Resources
Department of Frederick County Public Schools,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-01225-WMN)

Submitted:

December 30, 2011

Decided:

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

February 2, 2012

Appeal: 11-1716

Document: 23

Date Filed: 02/02/2012

Page: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Ostendorf, LAW OFFICE OF JASON OSTENDORF LLC, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellant.
Cynthia L. Maskol, WILSON, ELSER,
MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-1716

Document: 23

Date Filed: 02/02/2012

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Roy Rippeon appeals the district court’s order denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2006)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Rippeon

v. Frederick Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:10-cv-01225-WMN (D. Md.
June 16, 2011).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3