Lorenzo Richardson v. State of North Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998708644-2] Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00081-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [998786589]. Mailed to: Lorenzo Richardson. [11-1744]

Appeal: 11-1744

Document: 13

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1744

LORENZO DOMINIC RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-cv-00081-D)

Submitted:

February 9, 2012

Decided:

December 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Dominic Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1744

Document: 13

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo
court’s

order

Dominic

accepting

Richardson

the

appeals

recommendation

of

the
the

district
magistrate

judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
and find no reversible error.
reasons

stated

by

the

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

district

court.

Richardson

v.

Carolina, No. 5:11-cv-00081-D (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2011).
Richardson’s

motion

for

relief,

and

we

dispense

North

We deny

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2