Lorenzo Richardson v. Corinda Greene

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998708644-2] Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00202-H. Copies to all parties and the district court. [998786599]. Mailed to: Lorenzo Richardson. [11-1745]

Appeal: 11-1745

Document: 12

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1745

LORENZO DOMINIC RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORINDA GREENE,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00202-H)

Submitted:

February 9, 2012

Decided:

February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Dominic Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1745

Document: 12

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo
court’s

order

Dominic

accepting

Richardson

the

appeals

recommendation

of

the
the

district
magistrate

judge and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his complaint in
which

he

sought

to

appeal

the

state

court’s

denial

of

request to appeal his North Carolina child support order.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006).
find no reversible error.

for

the

Richardson v.

See District of Columbia Court of

2011).

reasons

Greene,

See

We have reviewed the record and

Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983).
affirm

his

No.

stated

by

the

5:11-cv-00202-H

Accordingly, we
district

(E.D.N.C.

court.
July

6,

We deny Richardson’s motions for relief and we dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2