Ronald Luber v. Anne Arundel County Maryland
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00237-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998761698]. Mailed to: Ronald Luber. [11-1825]
Appeal: 11-1825
Document: 8
Date Filed: 01/10/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1825
RONALD LUBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MARYLAND; ANNE HATCHER, in her official
capacity; MARY ROBERTS; DANIEL KANE, in his official
capacity; ROBERT HUBBARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-00237-RDB)
Submitted:
December 6, 2011
Decided:
January 10, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Luber, Appellant
ARUNDEL
COUNTY
OFFICE
Appellees.
Pro
OF
Se.
LAW,
Philip E. Culpepper, ANNE
Annapolis,
Maryland,
for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1825
Document: 8
Date Filed: 01/10/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald
Luber
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his
complaint.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Luber v. Anne Arundel Cnty., Md., No. 1:11-cv-
00237-RDB (D. Md. filed July 12, 2011; entered July 20, 2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?