Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cv-00318-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998805428]. Mailed to: appellant Ashima K. Kant and appellee Jay L. Cohen. [11-1844]
Appeal: 11-1844
Document: 18
Date Filed: 03/08/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1844
CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JAY L. COHEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08cv-00318-RWT)
Submitted:
January 6, 2012
Decided:
March 8, 2012
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se.
Appellee Pro Se.
Jay L. Cohen,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1844
Document: 18
Date Filed: 03/08/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district
court’s order affirming the clerk’s order taxing costs.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
See
Kant
11,
v.
Cohen,
No.
8:08-cv-00318-RWT
2011; entered July 12, 2011).
(D.
Md.
filed
July
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?