Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cv-00318-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998805428]. Mailed to: appellant Ashima K. Kant and appellee Jay L. Cohen. [11-1844]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1844 Document: 18 Date Filed: 03/08/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1844 CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JAY L. COHEN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08cv-00318-RWT) Submitted: January 6, 2012 Decided: March 8, 2012 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Appellee Pro Se. Jay L. Cohen, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1844 Document: 18 Date Filed: 03/08/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district court’s order affirming the clerk’s order taxing costs. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kant 11, v. Cohen, No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT 2011; entered July 12, 2011). (D. Md. filed July We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?