US v. Soledad De Avilez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:08-cr-00028-D-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998902810].. [11-1880]
Appeal: 11-1880
Doc: 38
Filed: 07/26/2012
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1880
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SOLEDAD LOPEZ DE AVILEZ; MATEO AVILEZ DUARTE,
Claimants – Appellants,
and
JULIAN AVILEZ,
Defendant,
DON CECIL HINSON,
Claimant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (7:08-cr-00028-D-1)
Submitted:
June 26, 2012
Decided:
July 26, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorgelina
Carolina,
E. Araneda, ARANEDA LAW
for Appellants.
Thomas
FIRM, PC, Raleigh, North
G. Walker, United States
Appeal: 11-1880
Doc: 38
Filed: 07/26/2012
Pg: 2 of 3
Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Stephen A. West, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 11-1880
Doc: 38
Filed: 07/26/2012
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Soledad Lopez De Avilez and Mateo Avilez Duarte appeal
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing
their
petition
with
respect to real property subject to an order of forfeiture and
entering
a
final
order
of
forfeiture.
The
district
court
dismissed the petition as a sanction for failure to comply with
a court order compelling discovery.
We have reviewed the briefs
and the relevant portions of the record and find no abuse of
discretion by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Avilez,
dispense
No.
7:08-cr-00028-D-1
with
oral
argument
(E.D.N.C.
because
July
the
United States v.
29,
2011).
facts
and
We
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?