Cheryl Carter v. McCreary Modern, Incorporated

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998804517].. [11-1901]

Appeal: 11-1901

Document: 28

Date Filed: 03/07/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1901

CHERYL B. CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCCREARY MODERN, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC)

Submitted:

February 28, 2012

Decided:

March 7, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jenny L. Sharpe, LAW OFFICE OF JENNY L. SHARPE, Charlotte, North
Carolina; Tamara W. Brooks, BROOKS LAW OFFICE, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Stephen M. Thomas, Michael P. Thomas,
Susan W. Matthews, PATRICK, HARPER & DIXON, L.L.P., Hickory,
North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1901

Document: 28

Date Filed: 03/07/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Cheryl

B.

Carter

appeals

from

the

district

court’s

order granting summary judgment in favor of McCreary Modern,
Inc., in her action in which she alleged that McCreary regarded
her as disabled and employed improper qualifications standards
in

denying

appeal

and

her

employment.

the

reversible error.

briefs

We

filed

have

by

the

reviewed

the

parties

and

record

on

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Carter v. McCreary Modern, Inc., No.

5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2011).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2