In re: Johnny Gore

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998667569-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998667564-2] Originating case number: 4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9,4:10-cv-70283-CWH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998701368]. Mailed to: Gore. [11-1917]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1917 Document: 7 Date Filed: 10/17/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1917 In re: JOHNNY LEE GORE, a/k/a Manager, Petitioner. On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9; 4:10-cv-70283-CWH) Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Lee Gore, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1917 Document: 7 Date Filed: 10/17/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. court’s docket reveals that motion on September 9, 2011. the Our review of the district district court ruled on the Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gore’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We oral dispense with argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?