In re: Johnny Gore
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998667569-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998667564-2] Originating case number: 4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9,4:10-cv-70283-CWH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998701368]. Mailed to: Gore. [11-1917]
Appeal: 11-1917
Document: 7
Date Filed: 10/17/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1917
In re:
JOHNNY LEE GORE, a/k/a Manager,
Petitioner.
On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus
(4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9; 4:10-cv-70283-CWH)
Submitted:
October 13, 2011
Decided:
October 17, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Lee Gore, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1917
Document: 7
Date Filed: 10/17/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Johnny
Lee
Gore
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion for reconsideration.
He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act.
court’s
docket
reveals
that
motion on September 9, 2011.
the
Our review of the district
district
court
ruled
on
the
Accordingly, because the district
court has recently decided Gore’s motion, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We
oral
dispense
with
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?