In re: Janse Cooke
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998680702-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus as moot (FRAP 21) [998673198-2]. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00156-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998825528]. Mailed to: Janse Cooke. [11-1954]
Appeal: 11-1954
Document: 10
Date Filed: 04/04/2012
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1954
In Re:
JANSE ELIOT COOKE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
March 13, 2012
(1:10-cv-00156-LPA)
Decided:
April 4, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janse Eliot Cooke, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-1954
Document: 10
Date Filed: 04/04/2012
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Janse Eliot Cooke petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition.
He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act.
district
court’s
docket
reveals
that
recently ruled on Cooke’s petition.
the
Our review of the
district
court
has
Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?