In re: Janse Cooke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998680702-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus as moot (FRAP 21) [998673198-2]. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00156-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998825528]. Mailed to: Janse Cooke. [11-1954]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-1954 Document: 10 Date Filed: 04/04/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1954 In Re: JANSE ELIOT COOKE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: March 13, 2012 (1:10-cv-00156-LPA) Decided: April 4, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janse Eliot Cooke, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-1954 Document: 10 Date Filed: 04/04/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Janse Eliot Cooke petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. district court’s docket reveals that recently ruled on Cooke’s petition. the Our review of the district court has Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?