James Roudabush v. Thomas Belk

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00255-GCM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998786524]. Mailed to: Roudabush. [11-1968]

Appeal: 11-1968

Document: 16

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1968

JAMES L. ROUDABUSH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THOMAS M. BELK, JR.; BELK STORES, INC.; JAN W. WALKE;
HARNEY; SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SHERIFF; WILLIAM NEELY; JOHN
DOE, Loss Prevention Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00255-GCM)

Submitted:

January 17, 2012

Decided:

February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James L. Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1968

Document: 16

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James L. Roudabush appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
find

no

reasons

reversible
stated

by

error.
the

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

district

court.

we

affirm

Roudabush

No. 3:11-cv-00255-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8 & 19, 2011).

for
v.

the

Belk,

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

the

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2