Yvonne Nelson v. Department of Social Service

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cv-03119-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998786495]. Mailed to: Yyonne Nelson. [11-1979]

Appeal: 11-1979

Document: 31

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1979

YVONNE NELSON; D. N.; D. N,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, City of Conway; EMPLOYMENT
SECURITY COMMISSION; HORRY COUNTY SCHOOLS; HORRY COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT;
HORRY
GEORGETOWN
TECHNICAL
COLLEGE;
HOUSING
AUTHORITIES; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; WACCAMAW MENTAL
HEALTH DEPARTMENT,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MEDICAID,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:10-cv-03119-RBH)

Submitted:

February 9, 2012

Decided:

February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 11-1979

Document: 31

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvonne Nelson, D.N., D.N., Appellants Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; John Betts
McCutcheon, Jr., Lisa Arlene Thomas, THOMPSON & HENRY, PA,
Conway, South Carolina; Kimberly Kelley Blackburn, Kenneth
Lendren Childs, Allen Dean Smith, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, Columbia,
South Carolina; Christie Valerie Newman, Assistant United States
Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 11-1979

Document: 31

Date Filed: 02/13/2012

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Yvonne Nelson and her two minor children appeal the
district

court’s

order

accepting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate judge and granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss
the

complaint.

We

reversible error.

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Nelson v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No.

4:10-cv-03119-RBH (D.S.C. filed Aug. 25, 2011; entered Aug. 26,
2011).

We deny Nelson’s motion for settlement and motion for

explanation as moot.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3