In re: Scott Luellen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998693280-2]; granting Motion for leave to file [998680490-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998680494-2]; denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [998716664-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct [998740265-2]; denying Motion to clarify [998764717-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998680486-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00102-LO-1,1:09-cv-00681-LO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998779131]. Mailed to: Derek Andreson, Scott Luellen. [11-1992]

Appeal: 11-1992

Document: 14

Date Filed: 02/02/2012

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1992

In re: SCOTT E. LUELLEN,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:08-cr-00102-LO-1; 1:09-cv-00681-LO)

Submitted:

January 31, 2012

Decided:

February 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott E. Luellen, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 11-1992

Document: 14

Date Filed: 02/02/2012

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Scott E. Luellen petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C.A § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion.
now

ruled

on

Luellen’s

§ 2255

The district court has

motion.

Luellen’s petition alleging delay is moot.
the mandamus petition.

Thus,

we

find

that

Accordingly, we deny

We grant Luellen’s motions to file an

oversize brief and to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny his
motions

for

certificate
petition,

a
of

and

transcript
appealability,

to

clarify.

at
to
We

Government

expense,

amend/correct
dispense

with

for

a

his

mandamus

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2