Michael Sindram v. Douglas Robelen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998746787]. Mailed to: Sindram. [11-2005]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-2005 Document: 7 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2005 MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor; GERALD BRUCE LEE; PHYLLIS T. WALTON; LISA GRAYSON; U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE; JOHN HACKMAN, Defendants – Appellees, and PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD) Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-2005 Document: 7 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order enjoining him from filing further civil actions in the district court without receiving pre-filing authorization. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?