Michael Sindram v. Douglas Robelen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998746787]. Mailed to: Sindram. [11-2005]
Appeal: 11-2005
Document: 7
Date Filed: 12/19/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2005
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor; GERALD BRUCE LEE; PHYLLIS
T. WALTON; LISA GRAYSON; U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE; JOHN
HACKMAN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD)
Submitted:
December 15, 2011
Decided:
December 19, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 11-2005
Document: 7
Date Filed: 12/19/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order
enjoining him from filing further civil actions in the district
court
without
receiving
pre-filing
authorization.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Sindram
v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2011).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?