Xuli Zhang v. S. Regan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [998764621-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-01329-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998796630]. Mailed to: Zhang. [11-2013]

Download PDF
Appeal: 11-2013 Document: 16 Date Filed: 02/27/2012 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2013 XULI ZHANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. POLICE S. REGAN; POLICE PEC. M. GREEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan, Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-01329-TCB) Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Xuli Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. COUNTY Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 11-2013 Document: 16 Date Filed: 02/27/2012 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Xuli denying relief Zhang on her post-judgment motion. * reversible error. appeals 42 the U.S.C. magistrate § 1983 judge’s (2006) order complaint and We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Zhang v. Regan, No. 1:10-cv-01329-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 17, 2011 & entered Aug. 18, 2011; Nov. 28, 2011). We deny Zhang’s motion for sanctions and request for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006), consented to proceeding before a magistrate judge. 2 the parties

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?